Our World’s Simplest Brands: The B2B Report 2026 examines how B2B decision-makers perceive simplicity across 80 brands in four industries—and how those perceptions relate to trust, consideration, and the desire to do business. In this excerpt, Rishi Dhir shares his perspective on the report’s UK industrials findings.
The business value of simplicity
Across the US and UK, simpler industrials brands earn greater loyalty, trust, and consideration. The study reports the following advantages:
Simplicity impact |
Industrials |
|---|---|
| Increase in NPS |
+32 |
| More likely to receive the benefit of the doubt |
40% |
| More likely to be considered |
27% |
| More likely to be trusted to do the right thing |
39% |
| More desirable to do business with |
66% |
What drives simplicity in industrials
The research identifies five leading brand elements that contribute to perceived simplicity in technology, shown below in order of contribution.
Category |
Brand element |
|---|---|
|
Brand strategy |
Company direction is clear |
|
Brand visuals/design |
Visually consistent |
|
Brand strategy |
Easy to find the product/service |
|
Brand communications |
Communicates compellingly |
|
Brand communications |
Communicates relevantly |
UK manufacturers need a clear path from promise to performance.
European manufacturing is under pressure from almost every direction at once.
Energy costs remain stubbornly high. Global demand is uneven. Talent is harder to find. Supply chains are being redrawn by geopolitics. Decarbonisation is no longer a distant ambition, but an operating requirement. And all the while, manufacturers are being asked to become more digital, more automated, more resilient, and more productive.
No pressure, then.
This is the context in which simplicity matters. Not because manufacturing is simple. Quite the opposite. Modern manufacturing is one of the most complex commercial environments on earth. The point is not to make that complexity disappear. It is to make it usable.
A factory has a way of finding out whether an idea is real. Machines either run or they don’t. Parts arrive or they don’t. Energy bills go up whether or not the strategy deck has been beautifully typeset. A production line is not especially moved by a vision statement. It wants to know what happens next.
That is why, for UK and European industrial buyers, the value of a brand is not whether it sounds innovative. It is whether it helps people act.
Our research suggests that industrial buyers reward brands that create clarity around direction, coherence and practical advantage. They want to understand where a company is headed. They want to see how its products and services fit together. They want to know what makes it different. And, crucially, they want to believe it can help their business compete.
Sounds obvious right? Until you look at how industrial brands communicate.
Too often, the category mistakes size for clarity. It presents the full extent of its engineering brilliance, service capability, software stack, sustainability credentials, partner network, and 147-year heritage as though the customer has arrived with a spare afternoon and a fondness for organisational charts.
The result is not confidence. It is fatigue with better lighting.
Industrial buyers are not asking brands to make the world less complex. They know better than that. They are asking brands to turn ambition into sequence. To show what matters first, what connects to what, and how progress can happen without creating a new operational headache.
That is the difference between a brand that is admired and a brand that is chosen.
Siemens is a useful example because its challenge is almost comically difficult: how do you make one of Europe’s broadest industrial technology portfolios feel coherent?
The answer has not been to make Siemens small. It has been to give the breadth a clearer organising idea. Siemens increasingly presents itself as “the connector” between the real and digital worlds: factories, grids, buildings, and infrastructure made more intelligent through software, automation, data, and simulation.
That idea gives the portfolio a spine. Siemens Xcelerator, digital twins, and its push around industrial AI all point in the same direction: helping customers connect what happens on screen with what happens on site. The individual technologies are complex. The role is simple. Siemens helps manufacturers see, simulate, and improve the system before they have to bet the factory on it.
That is simplicity as structure. Not a smaller offer, but a clearer operating system for change.
ABB plays a different role. Its world is electrification, motion, and automation: the less theatrical, more essential business of making things work better.
That matters because manufacturing transformation is rarely experienced as a grand leap into the future. It is experienced as a thousand decisions about uptime, energy use, asset performance, safety, maintenance, and throughput. The promise is not “welcome to tomorrow.” It is “your plant will run better.”
ABB’s simplicity comes from that practical focus. Its decision to sell its robotics business sharpens the point: ABB is concentrating on electrification and automation, the systems that help customers improve energy efficiency, reliability, and productivity. That may sound less glamorous than a grand industrial moonshot. It is also exactly where many European manufacturers feel the pressure most acutely.
In a factory, visibility is not a nice-to-have. It is the difference between spotting a problem early and discovering it expensively. ABB makes complexity feel manageable by focusing on the systems that keep industry moving and energy under control.
That is simplicity as focus.
Schneider Electric brings a third lesson: simplicity as sustainability made operational.
Sustainability in manufacturing can easily become a fog of targets, disclosures, offsets, pathways, pledges, and reassuring photographs of trees. Everyone agrees it matters. Fewer people know what to do on Monday morning.
Schneider’s strength is that it makes the energy transition feel usable. Its world of electrification, automation, software, and energy management gives customers a practical way to connect sustainability to performance. Recent work around AI-native energy management and sustainable, AI-ready infrastructure reinforces the same idea: sustainability cannot sit in a report. It has to show up in the systems that manage energy, carbon, cooling, capacity, and cost.
That is the trick. Schneider does not make sustainability simple by making it sentimental. It makes it simpler by making it useful.
For UK and European manufacturers, this is more than a branding question. It is a competitiveness question.
Europe has deep advantages in engineering, quality, regulation, sustainability, and industrial know-how. But those advantages are not self-explanatory. They need to be translated into offers, systems, and stories that buyers can navigate.
A brand cannot simply say it is advanced. It has to show how advancement becomes usable on the ground.
This is the real work of simplicity in manufacturing. Not polishing away the complexity. Not pretending transformation is neat. Not reducing a serious industrial offer to a friendly slogan and a stock image of a wind turbine at sunset.
The work is translation.
From portfolio to pathway. From capability to consequence. From “here is everything we can do” to “here is how we help you move.”
What European manufacturers need are brands that can make the future operational. The winners will be the ones that understand a basic industrial truth: progress only counts when it can be put to work.
That is simplicity’s real work: from portfolio to pathway; capability to consequence; promise to performance. The future only matters when you can put it to work.
Explore the full findings across financial services, technology, industrials, and healthcare.
Download World’s Simplest Brands: The B2B Report 2026