Our World’s Simplest Brands: The B2B Report 2026 examines how B2B decision-makers perceive simplicity across 80 brands in four industries—and how those perceptions relate to trust, consideration, and the desire to do business. In this excerpt, Rishi Dhir shares his perspective on the report’s UK technology findings.

 

The business value of simplicity

Across the US and UK, simpler technology brands earn greater loyalty, trust, and consideration. The study reports the following advantages:

Simplicity impact


Technology


Increase in NPS

+32

More likely to receive the benefit of the doubt

86%

More likely to be considered

22%

More likely to be trusted to do the right thing

54%

More desirable to do business with

44%

 

What drives simplicity in technology

The research identifies five leading brand elements that contribute to perceived simplicity in technology, shown below in order of contribution.

Category


Brand element


Brand communications

Sounds distinct

Brand strategy

Company direction is clear

Brand strategy

Competitive advantage

Brand strategy

Presentation of products is distinct

Brand communications

Communicates clearly

 

Technology brands earn confidence when buyers can understand what they do, why it matters, and where it leads.

Picture the scene.

You are a European technology buyer. You’ve spent the morning in back-to-back AI demos, each promising to “unlock enterprise transformation at scale.” One vendor has mentioned “agents” 14 times. Another has shown you a diagram that looks suspiciously like a plate of spaghetti. 

By lunchtime, you don’t feel inspired. You feel tired. 

That is the great irony of modern technology. An industry built to make business easier has become one of the hardest to understand. 

The result is a category full of brands trying desperately to sound intelligent, while forgetting to be intelligible. 

And in Europe, that matters. 

Our latest World’s Simplest Brands research shows that European B2B buyers reward technology brands that feel clear, coherent, and easy to trust. Many of those brands, perhaps uncomfortably, are American. But this is not a story about European failure. Nor is it proof that Europe’s technology future must be written in an American accent. 

It tells us something more useful. 

UK and European buyers are not simply buying technology. They are buying confidence: that their data is safe, that the platform will scale, that AI will help rather than embarrass them in front of a regulator, and that the thing they recommend to the board will still make sense six months from now. 

For years, technology brands have sold speed. Faster systems. Faster decisions. Faster transformation. Faster everything. The future, apparently, was one long sprint. 

But Europe has a different relationship with the future. We like innovation, but we also like asking the awkward questions before it gets the keys to the house. Who owns the data? Where is it stored? What happens if the infrastructure fails?  

These questions are not resistance. They are responsibility. 

That is why simplicity in European technology has a different flavour from simplicity in the US. In the US, the emphasis is often on adoption at speed. In Europe, it increasingly means trust under scrutiny. 

This is where many technology brands lose the plot. They mistake complexity for credibility. They pile on features, frameworks, dashboards, sub-brands, acronyms, and “agentic” promises until the customer is left wandering through a gold-plated fog of jargon. 

The problem is that complexity without a clear point of view leaves customers doing the hard work themselves: joining the dots, weighing the trade-offs, and trying to work out what actually matters. 

Our research shows that the strongest technology brands are not just the ones that seem easy to use. They are the ones that give buyers a clear sense of where the brand is going, what makes it different, how its products fit together, and why it creates a competitive advantage. That is bigger than usability. It is brand as orientation. Brand as reassurance. Brand as the thing that helps a buyer say, “Yes, I understand this. Yes, I can defend this. Yes, I can take this to the board without a translator.” 

This principle takes different forms depending on the technology. Sometimes it means making complexity feel governable. Sometimes it means making the abstract tangible. And sometimes it means giving complicated infrastructure a story people can understand. 

Take Microsoft Azure. 

Azure does not make cloud simple by pretending cloud is simple. What Azure does well is make cloud feel governable. 

For European customers, that is powerful. Microsoft’s EU Data Boundary and European Digital Commitments answer the question sitting quietly behind many technology decisions: “Are we still in control?” That may sound like policy plumbing. Emotionally, it is reassurance. It tells customers they can move forward without feeling reckless. 

That is simplicity. Not fewer features. Fewer sleepless nights. 

Salesforce offers a different lesson. If Microsoft makes cloud feel governable, Salesforce is trying to make AI feel visitable. 

AI is abstract. Agentic AI is even more so. For many executives, it sits somewhere between miracle, menace, and a management consultancy slide. Which is why Salesforce’s decision to bring its London AI Centre and Salesforce Tower together as a connected campus matters: it gives the future a physical address. 

Much of the conversation about AI’s future is about making it invisible, seamlessly woven into the way we work. Salesforce is taking a different tack: making AI something you can walk up to, see in action, and question. 

This is about more than experience design. It’s about closing the gap between understanding what AI might do and imagining what you could actually do with it. That’s where curiosity starts to become confidence. 

NVIDIA shows how the same principle can work at the level of infrastructure. It has taken the highly complex business of building the computing power behind AI and distilled it into a simple idea: it is the engine of the AI age. 

That word, “engine,” does a lot of work. It makes something abstract feel physical. It makes infrastructure feel active. It turns a chip into a cause. It helps governments, investors and executives understand why NVIDIA matters without needing to understand every technical layer beneath it. 

In the UK, NVIDIA has connected that story to national ambition, including partnerships on AI infrastructure and skills. Suddenly, a component most people will never see becomes a passport to the future. 

The lessons are different, but the thread is the same. Microsoft offers reassurance. Salesforce makes AI tangible. NVIDIA turns complex infrastructure into a story about the future. Each gives buyers a clearer reason to believe in what the technology can do. 

This is Europe’s opportunity. 

Not to out-shout Silicon Valley, but to out-clarify it. To build technology brands that treat regulation not as a burden, but as a trust advantage. To make sovereignty practical rather than pompous. To make AI useful rather than theatrical. To design systems, stories, and experiences that reduce the customer’s internal effort, not add to it. 

Because what buyers are responding to is clarity. 

In the age of AI, intelligence will be everywhere. Confidence will be rarer. And confidence begins when people understand what you do, why it mattesr, and why they can trust you with what comes next.

 

Explore the full findings across financial services, technology, industrials, and healthcare. 

Download World’s Simplest Brands: The B2B Report 2026