AI

AI is the moment Gen X has been training for

Pat Attenasio
April 2026

The business risk no one talks about  

AI is making it easier than ever to produce content. It’s also making it easier than ever to sound exactly like everyone else. 

For business leaders, the real risk isn’t adoption. It’s sameness. It’s speed replacing judgment. It’s scale flattening taste. In a world where anyone can generate a decent first draft in seconds, distinctiveness becomes harder to protect and more valuable than ever. 

That’s why remembering a world before algorithms might be one of the most useful skills you can bring to a world run by them. 

What happens when the last analog generation meets the most powerful digital tool ever conceived? Gen X isn’t leading AI adoption. But we might be the ones who help keep it human. 

The smirk phase didn’t last 

When ChatGPT dropped in 2022, I gave it a smirk and an eye roll, then went back to work. Nice try, AI. You’re not replacing me. I figured it would go the way of Apple Newton or Google Glasses. Interesting. Promising. Ultimately forgettable. 

A year later, my smirk was gone.  

AI had stopped sounding like a robot doing a bad impression of an awkward human. It was getting smoother. Sharper. Harder to dismiss. Then I had the same oh shit moment pretty much every Gen Xer I know did: Is this thing about to make me obsolete? 

Using AI vs. using it well 

We’re not the ones adopting AI fastest. Gen Z is. But there’s a difference between using AI and using it well. Between moving fast and moving wisely. And that’s where our generation has something theirs doesn’t. 

Fluency isn’t the same as judgment 

In my office, our Gen Z teammates were quick to adopt. They’re fluent with AI in ways we’re still learning. But here’s what I noticed: they’ve never known a world without algorithms. 

They don’t remember when search results weren’t personalized. When feeds weren’t curated. When “viral” wasn’t a strategy. That fluency is powerful. But it also means they sometimes trust the output more than they should. 

Gen X got curious in a different way. We were trying to understand AI’s potential because, honestly, we weren’t sure it wouldn’t replace ours. So, we poked at it. Pushed it. Took it to weird places. Tried to break it on purpose. Less like a tool. More like an instrument you practice until you can actually play. 

Prompting is taste, not math  

In my world as a brand communications director, I’ve spent the past two years road testing AI platforms of every kind. Two things became obvious fast.  

First, AI’s default setting is people-pleasing. 

Second, prompt engineering is more art than science. It’s not math. It’s taste. 

AI will give you an answer that sounds right before it gives you an answer that is right. It’s been trained to be helpful, agreeable, confident, even when it’s wrong. If you don’t bring judgment into the process, you’ll mistake fluency for quality. 

Past the blank page 

The surprise wasn’t that AI could do parts of my job. It was how quickly it could handle what clients struggle with most: the blank page, the first draft, the corporate throat-clearing. The ninety percent that slows everything down.  

That freed us up to do the part only humans can do. Curate. Edit. Add taste. Add personality. Make the work feel like it came from someone, not something.  

Client says they want their voice to sound bold? Two years ago, that meant weeks and a 50-page deck to explore three flavors of bold. Now I can show them a whole spectrum in seconds. How far they can stretch. Where it breaks. What works across email versus social versus a campaign launch. 

All of it faster than rewinding a Blockbuster tape.   

We remember when tech lied 

Gen Z grew up trusting algorithms because algorithms mostly worked. Google gave them the right answer. Netflix recommended shows they liked. TikTok knew what was trending next.  

Gen X remembers when technology lied to us constantly. 

When MapQuest sent you to the wrong address. When dial-up failed right when you needed it most. When you had to double-check everything because the system wasn’t always right.  

That skepticism is the feature that matters most right now. We test. We question. We assume there’s an edge somewhere. That instinct might be the most important guardrail in the AI era.  

The age of AI sameness 

AI’s upside is massive. So is its misuse. 

If we’re not paying attention, the same tools that free us up can also drain the humanity out of everything. Connection. Imperfection. Craft. All the small choices that don’t scale neatly but make brands feel alive. 

You can feel the pushback already. “Slop” was Word of the Year in 2025 for a reason. We’re drowning in low-effort content, synthetic sameness, and copy-paste everything.  

People aren’t just noticing. They’re craving the opposite. Brands that feel made, not generated. Voices that have something new to say.  

Pattern recognition, not nostalgia 

And who’s best positioned to spot the difference? The generation that grew up on hair bands and Nirvana. We can feel when something’s been generated versus authentic. That’s not nostalgia. It’s pattern recognition. 

We’re also the last generation with our feet firmly planted in the analog world. No GPS. No helicopter parents. That resourcefulness translates.  

The job: keep it human 

For decades, Gen X has been treated like the Jan Brady of generations. Then AI showed up, and for a hot minute, it felt like we were about to become latchkey kids forever.  

But it turns out we’re not the ones getting replaced. We’re the ones who can keep the replacement mentality from taking over. 

Look, I’m not saying we’re better at this than Gen Z. They’re faster. More fluent. Less afraid. But being fast doesn’t make you wise. Being fluent doesn’t mean you have judgment. And fearlessness without guardrails isn’t confidence. It’s risk. 

What we bring is something you can’t learn from a prompt library: memory of what disappears when you optimize too fast. We’ve watched enough technology promises break to know which ones to trust.  

We’re not the future of AI. But we might just be the ones who keep that future human. 

Take that, Marcia, Marcia, Marcia. 

 

Pat Attenasio is Director of Brand Communication at global brand consultancy Siegel+Gale.

Related

Now, for the first time, AI is revolutionizing the game—transforming brand voice from an afterthought into a competitive advantage. At last, brands can finally lock in their voice with precision, speed and consistency like never before.

Pat Attenasio

AI

Welcome to the golden age of brand voice—powered by AI

Now, for the first time, AI is revolutionizing the game—transforming brand voice from an afterthought into a competitive advantage. At last, brands can finally lock in their voice with precision, speed and consistency like never before.

Pat Attenasio

For Pat Attenasio, Director of Brand Communication, simplicity isn’t a given—it’s an art that demands hard work, but leads to copy that lands and collaboration that flows naturally.

Pat Attenasio

News

The Subtext interview: Pat Attenasio

For Pat Attenasio, Director of Brand Communication, simplicity isn’t a given—it’s an art that demands hard work, but leads to copy that lands and collaboration that flows naturally.

Pat Attenasio

Closing the gap between intention and interpretation.

Michelle Duda

Insights

When words go wrong

Closing the gap between intention and interpretation.

Michelle Duda