We think, therefore, we are. What do you think?

Archive for the ‘media & entertainment’ Category

Nov 6th, 2009 by Howard Belk

Mickey Mouse Channels Dennis the Menace … and Chucky

Seems Disney is considering a Dennis the Menace meets Chucky refresh of Mickey Mouse. (See “After Mickey’s Makeover, Less Mr. Nice Guy,” the New York Times, November 5, 2009.) It seems risky, but millions of us contributed to DC Comics’ success when they let us see the dark side of Batman. A conflicted, sometimes tortured Batman rejuvenated the franchise and dramatically broadened the superhero’s audience. Sophisticated kids today are not engaged by characters who verge on the dogmatic or overly simplistic. Too nice, or too mean, is uninteresting. Even the hero of THE INCREDIBLES had flaws. Kids saw that and laughed.

Disney has a relevancy issue with their spokesmouse because they for so long used Mickey as a symbol of the company, not a character involved in situations that have any relevance to youth. Mickey has sold out, gone corporate, and lost all texture.

It’s vital that Mickey gets another dimension added to his personality. It will confirm for kids that you can be one way, AND another, rather than this simplistic, all or nothing type of creature. That’s simply too much to live up to.

A darker Mickey with a heightened survival mode, delivered in a gaming environment should connect with youngsters if only because kids will be excited to see how they can help Mickey “survive” in this new world. Chronicles of mischievous schemes, tight spots, and narrow escapes should give an old character a new chance to connect with the timeless scamp that resides in every kid. And because today video games are one of the main channels through which kids connect with characters, this makes sense.

In the end however, it will come down to the sense of morality and hopefulness that Mickey has always stood for. If breaking the rules means creativity, ingenuity, smarts and empathy, then bring it on, badass mouse! If our new Mickey is cunning, callous, wasteful, and lewd, then Disney has set its own mousetrap.

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jul 2nd, 2008 by Siegel Gale

Has Your Product’s Name Grown Long in the Tooth?

People have a tendency to ‘hang on’ to things well past their prime. Go take a glance at your attic if you need a reminder. Maybe it is out of comfort, convenience, or fear of the unknown. Regardless of the reason, our fast-paced society often has real difficulty in discarding things.

As brand consultants we see glaring examples of this in, of all places, product naming. To be sure, a quick scan of the media and entertainment landscape is replete with examples of names that people tend to ’stick with’ - names that may in fact need to be put out to pasture.

Consider High Speed Internet. In a hugely competitive marketplace, cable operators (Charter Communications) and satellite companies (Direct TV) alike, offer Internet services as part of their normal product bundles, and market them based on price and speed. The question here is – if every provider is vying for the fastest Internet, and speeds are getting faster every day, is it necessary to continue to refer to the Internet in terms of high speed, as in High Speed Internet or High Speed Data? From a distance, it seems a somewhat redundant brand attribute to highlight within the echelon of selling benefits. For the same reason, one would probably not describe an Indy car as ‘fast’ to a friend — Indy car tells the whole story, right?

How about the fact that the music industry still hands out awards each year at the GRAMMYS based on "Record of the Year" and "Album of The Year", yet most teenage consumers have never purchased either. In this case, the name is a convention and as long as consumers ‘get it’, it probably is not worth investing in new nomenclature.

And why do we still use the term wireless? At one point in time, ‘wireless’ was a breakthrough concept and spoke chiefly to how digital information was transmitted from tower to tower and then on to a device. But now, as wireless is a common part of our routine, and as the platform is capable of delivering more and more services, maybe next generation product names should be more linked to communicating a higher order of benefits? Take for example Virgin Mobile, who by going to market as ‘mobile’ versus ‘wireless’, can better focus the discussion with consumers on lifestyle benefits like independence, choice and control - A smart approach that is relevant to consumer needs.

If this interests you, take a look around and you’ll find a panoply of "dated" names that might need to be nudged off the stage. If you see one, let us know and maybe we can help arrange for its very comfortable, if not overdue, retirement.

Add Comment.

Permalink