We think, therefore, we are. What do you think?

Archive for February, 2010

Feb 26th, 2010 by Paul Louzado

MENA Private Equity focus: Unlocking the value of portfolio companies through strategic brand solutions

The rise of Private Equity (PE) in the Middle East & North Africa (MENA) region over the last four years has been nothing short of meteoric. By the end of 2008, there were more than 120 private equity houses present in the region having raised a combined $21 billion in total assets under management.

How quickly the world changes in 12 short months. The number of deals closed by MENA funds in the first nine months of 2009 fell by 65 percent to 12, coupled with a 75 percent fall in investments to $359 million compared to the same period in the year before. Industry observers estimate that there are now less than 40 PE houses remaining after a year that has witnessed the first contraction in the region’s total GDP in more than two decades1.

But from the wreckage of the last year new opportunities are emerging. In this weakened economy, an increasing number of companies are looking to either prune their portfolios to raise cash or exit non-core businesses. Conditions are ripe for players with aggressive ambitions to strengthen their market share or make cross-region consolidation plays. Industry analysts predict there will be an estimated $5-6 billion in new capital flowing into the region during the next four years2, and that cash will be looking for strong investment partners that can deliver solid returns.

Private equity’s entry into the MENA region was propelled by a period of unprecedented growth. As with any fast moving market, deal volume was the name of the game which naturally led to an emphasis on the acquisition side of the investment process. Any operational improvement activity within portfolio companies was primarily limited to financial restructuring and management transfer. However, in the current economic climate the market has changed, and correspondingly, so have the tactics of the leading PE players. Many firms are using the slowdown in deal activity to take the time to deepen their due diligence process and generally become more active in the operational aspects of value creation within their portfolio companies.

While it is heartening to observe this positive and much needed trend, we still frequently observe a neglected area—branding. It appears that when PE firms are considering the many potential improvement activities available within the value chain of a portfolio company, branding is often either ignored or relegated to a list of marketing to-do’s. It should be a priority action.

An intelligently aligned brand strategy will directly and positively impact financial returns. It is both a driver of operational change and a critical success factor in enhancing brand equity and elevating investments.

(more…)

Add Comment.

Permalink

Feb 24th, 2010 by Alan Siegel

America’s Crisis of Complexity: Alan Siegel’s Speech from TED 2010

How is it that we can run the country with a 16-page Constitution, yet it takes 2,074 pages and more than 400,000 words of gobbledygook to present the Senate Health Care Bill?

Washington insiders told me that if they ever passed this bill, over 40,000 pages of turgid regulations would follow before it became law in 2014.

Clearly our public officials have completely lost touch with the power of simple expression.

The social and economic costs when government fails to communicate can be considerable. When Americans can’t figure out how to complete their tax forms, apply for student loans, qualify for small business assistance, or understand their Medicare or Social Security benefits, the economy suffers, federal revenues decline, and confidence in government takes a dive.

(more…)

Comments (5)

Permalink

Feb 23rd, 2010 by Irene Etzkorn

11 pages instead of 1100 strikes me as right

President Obama unveiled his health care proposal yesterday and I was delighted to finally be able to form an opinion. The key elements of his proposal, available on the White House website, are only 11 pages in length. Prior to this, I really couldn’t express an opinion because I didn’t have the time, inclination or fortitude to read the 1100 page version put forth by Congress. At least now, I can actually understand what he is proposing. I don’t have to rely on spin doctors to interpret for me.

To be clear is to be brave. There is nowhere to hide in brevity. Long-winded legalese is like verbal brush in which all manner of unpleasant consequences can hide. I applaud the presentation of the President’s plan—significant differences from previous, Congressional versions are called out, a table of contents runs alongside the text and the highlights are easily accessible via a prominent tab and easily printed. Unlike previous mind-numbing versions, this one is clear enough to allow me to form an opinion.

Add Comment.

Permalink

Feb 23rd, 2010 by Siegel Gale

Siegel+Gale Selects Lisa Bertelsen to Lead Expanded Research Practice

NEW YORK, February 23, 2010 – Global strategic branding firm Siegel+Gale today announced the appointment of Lisa Bertelsen as global director of its Research Insights practice.

Bertelsen brings a diverse set of qualitative research expertise to Siegel+Gale’s research offerings, including over 15 years of consumer and B2B experience as a usability engineer, interface designer, online strategist and market researcher. In her new role, Bertelsen’s primary responsibility is to build a powerful global practice that uncovers innovative research insights in language, cognition and behavior to inform clear, credible and compelling brand-building programs.

(more…)

Add Comment.

Permalink

Feb 19th, 2010 by Siegel Gale

Review: The Wall Street Journal Guide to Information Graphics

Add another book to the growing library of guides on how to make information graphics the right way. Dona M. Wong, former graphics director of The Wall Street Journal and now strategy director for information Design at Siegel+Gale, provides the dos and don’ts of data presentation in The Wall Street Journal Guide to Information Graphics.

To read the full article, click here

Add Comment.

Permalink

Feb 19th, 2010 by Siegel Gale

3 signs of poor brand management in the digital age

Behind every great brand, there is a strong, visionary leader. Take the usual suspects: Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, Jeff Bezos at Amazon, and of course, Steve Jobs at Apple. All three are strong leaders who have crafted the enduring experiences that bring their creative visions to life. We live in the world they create for us, and pay good money to do so. But if their bold and beautiful branding is a sign of managerial geniuses at work, is the reverse true? Do weak brands signal weak management?

To read the full article by Matt Loebman of Siegel+Gale, click here.

Add Comment.

Permalink

Feb 11th, 2010 by Siegel Gale

Siegel+Gale Welcomes Back Branding Veteran in Leadership Role; Appoints Renee Peet as Group Director, Strategy of New York Office

NEW YORK, February 11, 2010 – Global strategic branding firm Siegel+Gale announced today the return of Renee Peet, appointed as group director, strategy of the firm’s headquarters in New York.

Working previously at the firm between 2000 and 2004, Peet returns to Siegel+Gale to lead strategy engagements for some of the world’s most notable brands. As group director, strategy of Siegel+Gale’s New York office, Peet assumes responsibility for leading the strategy group to build world-class brands through elegantly simple strategies, communications and experiences.

(more…)

Add Comment.

Permalink

Feb 8th, 2010 by Alan Siegel

Standard for government: ‘Let us be clear’

“President Obama recently held a White House Forum on Modernizing Government with more than 50 corporate executives to discuss how the federal government can make better use of cutting-edge technologies. As the president explained, it is unconscionable that “there are still places in the federal government where reams of yellow files in manila envelopes are walked from desk to desk.” He set many of the right goals: making more information available to the public, ensuring that documents are online as well as in print, and making greater use of social media.”

To read the full op-ed piece by Alan Siegel please visit FederalTimes.com.

Comments (2)

Permalink

Feb 4th, 2010 by Thomas Mueller

Revenue vs. Brand Value: How to maintain both and improve the customer experience

According to a JD Power survey of nearly 13,000 passengers who flew on a North American airline between April 2008 and May 2009, customer satisfaction declined due largely to unfavorable customer perceptions on in-flight services, flight crew, cost, and fees.

The importance of developing customer loyalty is part of the crisis airlines face today; this is particularly challenging as charging additional fees is viewed as one of the top tactics to increase revenue. “Unfortunately, any improvements in customer satisfaction are being offset by passengers’ displeasure with cutbacks on in-flight services, increases in fees, and issues with the helpfulness and courtesy of flight crews,” said Dale Haines, senior director of JDP’s travel practice.

These two surveys show additional fees are heavily relied on to increase revenue; however, these fees hinder clients’ appreciation for good customer service. Fees may generate revenue during a tough quarter, but they are undermining their brand’s value. Which is more important? Despite their annoyance to the flyer, ancillary fees have become an integral part of the airline revenue structure. Unfortunately, from a loyalty perspective, long-term brand value does not strengthen immediate revenue. On the flip side, the increase in fees coupled with the lack of clear communication surrounding them have resulted in a steady decline of customer loyalty and brand value.

It’s true that fees are bolstering bottom lines, so is there a way for airlines to keep fees without making customers feel like there’s a trick around every corner? Yes, with transparency.

Of course not every carrier can eliminate baggage fees like Southwest (despite losing $16M in 2009), but all carriers can be clear about what the fees are for and how customers will be charged. For instance, RyanAir “comes clean” on all its charges on its website, which provides a simple table with the facts and data a customer might need to figure out the additional cost on tickets.

Communicating clearly and honestly with customers is just one way to increase revenue through fees while improving customer satisfaction. Airlines can also extend brand value through appropriate trends and promotions. For example, Alaska Airlines recently launched “Mystery City Savings,” offering a 25% discount off fares between Portland, Oregon, and a new destination each day for five consecutive days. Customers are encouraged to log onto AlaskaAir.com to check out which new destinations will be highlighted each day.

“Rollover Minutes” (AT&T’s claim to fame) has just entered the loyalty program sphere. Marriot Rewards is applying this “rollover point” strategy to their hotel loyalty program. With “Elite Rollover Nights,” guests, who stay more nights than they need to achieve an Elite status, can roll those extra nights into 2010. Stemming from this, Delta Airlines recently initiated a rollover program, for members who are at least Silver status. The program allows 2009 miles to be rolled over toward qualifying in 2010—an offer sure to create a more enjoyable customer experience.

After all, it’s that experience, which when aligned with any carrier’s brand promise, supports financial business growth.

According to the Sabre Airline Study, customer loyalty and retention efforts are viewed by most airline decision makers (86 percent) as having the most positive impact on their businesses. Simultaneously, airline customer satisfaction has fallen to its lowest level in four years.

But enhancing the overall customer experience through clear, consistent communications and interactions increases customer satisfaction, retention, and loyalty—giving airlines the fuel to obtain both increased revenues and brand value.

Comments (1)

Permalink

Feb 2nd, 2010 by Fred Burt

Law firms failing to stand out

Law firms may well be the last bastion of the unbranded. Consider these statements, found on the websites of some of the market leaders:

+ “one of the world’s leading law firms”
+ “a world-class international law firm”
+ “one of the most prestigious law firms in the world”
+ “our people are our difference”
+ “a commitment to delivering high quality service”

Any of the firms we reviewed could claim any of these, and that’s the point. None stand out.

Let’s be clear, there is a sense of tiering that separates Magic Circle law firms from the rest in the UK. Most qualify for this elite club on the basis of being big. But big is a precarious leadership claim. Reed Smith has proven how easy it is to become a top 15 firm from nowhere in 5 years. The merger of UK-based Lovells and Hogan & Hartson, the US law firm, is seen as just the start of industry-wide consolidation. It will be interesting to see whether the new Hogan Lovells brand will be launched with a clear sense of the organisation’s unique points of differentiation. It will be a shame if this incredible opportunity becomes a naming exercise following the path of least resistance.

Marketing has long been seen as beneath many law firms, overly commercial in a business that is about relationships and service. But branding is, of course, much deeper than marketing. The firm’s brand should clearly reflect the philosophy behind the business and the firm’s way of working, both of which should provide means to the end of ‘leadership’, ‘world-class’ and even ‘prestigious.’

This clarity of purpose will deliver real business results. When shortlisted among their peers, they should be winning more often. When recruiting graduates, they should be attracting the best, for whom their culture is distinct and ‘for them.’ When discussing fees, they should be able to maintain a premium because their added value is clear. This has to be a priority of any Managing Partner or CEO, particularly if the leaders in the industry want to emerge from recession and command premium pricing again.

I met this week with a management consultant who specialises in dealing with senior management of US and UK law firms. He wholeheartedly agreed that law firms overlook their brand at their peril.

Goldman Sachs and McKinsey have shown how a single-minded approach to their positioning relative to their peers can set them apart and drive real, long-term business value. So the question seems to be: which of the law firms is going to step up in order to stand out?

Add Comment.

Permalink