We think, therefore, we are. What do you think?

Archive for January, 2009

Jan 30th, 2009 by Siegel Gale

Brand Transparency - A Conversation with Alan Siegel of Siegel+Gale

Keysplash Creative

Last week, I received a copy of Siegel + Gale’s report, “Siegel + Gale Simplicity Survey: A Clarion Call for Transparency” If you know anything about me, then you know that I am a big advocate of simple, clear and straightforward marketing messages and using common sense in marketing. I’m anti-shock advertising and hard sales messages. Consumers don’t have time to translate corporate rhetoric to try to figure out what you’re telling them. If you don’t get your message across quickly, you’ve wasted your time and money. Never has the need to be transparent been more crucial than it is during an economic downturn when consumers are actively searching for honest companies to do business with.


Click to read the entire article

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 28th, 2009 by Siegel Gale

First Family of Style

Michelle Obama

Just when I think Michelle Obama can’t get any classier than she already is, she does. It seems she’s consulting with some very sophisticated advisors on her fashion choices.

Her selections for the inauguration and the evening balls show a very subtle reversal of the choices most would expect her to make. For the events of the day, she picked a dress that made a bigger statement than the dress for the evening. It was a nice way to communicate that the events of the day were the more important events.

The dress she wore for the inauguration, by Isabel Toledo, was a choice beyond convention. Isabel is one of the world’s most amazing fashion designers, but she is only known to a very small niche of insiders. Her pattern-making is beyond fashion. It is real craft. A Cuban-American designer with a great deal of experience, the emphasis of Isabel’s fashion studio is not marketing or money. Its focus is on bringing art and experiment to the craft of dressmaking, whether others know about her work or not.

(more…)

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 27th, 2009 by Siegel Gale

Avoid Inviting Distrust

brandweek

There’s growing consumer demand for clarity, and growing antipathy toward jargon and other sorts of obfuscation. That’s one crystal-clear lesson to be drawn from a Siegel+Gale survey released this month.

It’s not as if most people were ever fans of needless complexity. But their distaste for it has taken on new urgency since the financial system’s near-collapse. Seventy-five percent of respondents to the polling, fielded in December and January among investors and homeowners, agreed that “Complexity and lack of understanding has played a significant role in the current financial crisis.” Nor do they think such opaque communication always happens by accident: Many detect a nefarious purpose in it (see the chart above).

This is reflected in another of the poll’s findings: 37 percent of respondents said they are less likely to trust their mortgage lender than they were a year earlier; 36 percent said the same about their broker or financial adviser and 35 percent about their bank.

Companies that do communicate lucidly have an advantage in creating a rapport with potential customers, to judge by another of the survey’s findings: 84 percent of respondents agreed (39 percent “strongly”) with the statement, “I am more likely to trust a company that uses jargon-free, plain English in its communications.”

If language of that sort were used in “explanations and disclosures” about various products and services, 79 percent of those polled would be more interested in investing in a financial product. Many others would be more apt to buy a life-insurance policy (67 percent), a new car (66 percent), a mobile phone (61 percent) or a laptop computer (58 percent). Sixty-three percent said they would be more likely to apply for a credit card and 60 percent to apply for a mortgage.

None of this means that people expect intrinsically complex material to be see-Spot-run easy to grasp. Seventy-six percent subscribed to the statement, “Financial products are inherently complicated. It’s the final responsibility of the customer to make sure they understand all the risks.” But that doesn’t stop them from looking askance at institutions that shirk a good-faith effort to help such understanding along.

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 26th, 2009 by Siegel Gale

The stimulus America needs: trust

Public trust in businesses is rock bottom. Simplicity will win it back.

Christian Science Monitor
In an effort to rebuild decades worth of lost trust, President Obama has called for transparency and openness in government. And a good thing too, as the intensity of consumer distrust is at the highest I’ve seen it in the past 30 years.

A survey of 1,200 adults we conducted this month reveals that trust in banks, mortgage lenders, and brokers has plunged nearly 40 percent in one year. Moreover, 63 percent of those surveyed feel that these businesses flagrantly make things more complicated in order to hide real risks. So how can businesses rebuild trust amid today’s global economy, deceptive propositions, double talk, and disclaimers?

They need to incorporate clarity and simplicity into their programs and communications. Corporations need to do more than improve governance and raise capital. They have to speak plainly to their constituencies. It is time to come out from behind unintelligible language.

Consider how one bank explained its “Simplicity card”: “All your APRs may automatically increase up to the Default APR if you default under any Card Agreement that you have with us because you fail to make a payment to us when due…”

With effort, you might have gotten the gist behind the happy sounding card and the thick language: Make a late payment on any card at the bank, and the bank will slam you with increased interest rates.

Can this kind of behavior possibly foster trust?

Government is just as guilty. Every spring, Americans are forced to face the challenge of filing taxes – an odious and emotionally charged ordeal that only alienates citizens and further weakens the bonds of civic trust.

In the poll I cited, Americans say that they are primed to demand simpler, more open practices and communications. The problem is, individual Americans have never stepped up to the plate.

Think of the times all of us just go ahead and pay phone bills we can’t decipher, suffer higher credit card fees for reasons we don’t understand, or stash puzzling healthcare bills in the drawer – unread. Giving up because we can’t understand something only encourages companies to underserve and deceive us.

Why tolerate overly complex, confusing propositions at all? Why do we allow organizations to bury basic terms of their business in technical jargon?

Years ago, I wrestled with lawyers to transform pages of caveats and codicils into a simple loan note. In the end, my team distilled 250 tangled words to this one sentence: “If you don’t pay on time, you will be in default, and we will take legal action against you.” This is how trust is built, not by hiding behind legalese.

There are a few companies who do retain loyal customers with fair and open treatment. One online bank’s “privacy policy” is not pages of thick wording. Instead, it states plainly, “We will not give or sell your private information to anyone.” This is clear – and blessedly in tune with consumer wishes.

Steve Jobs, cofounder of Apple, has used simplicity as a competitive weapon, turning his company into a citadel of simple, engaging design. Warren Buffett, the world’s most successful investor, explains his company’s strategy in ordinary words in an annual report that thousands read for wisdom and pleasure.

I have worked with major corporations, government agencies, and not-for-profits to simplify every conceivable type of contract and document. There are wonderful models of communications that prove simplicity is possible – and research confirms the enormous benefits for companies and consumers. We just need to follow these models.

Today’s crisis may hold this silver lining: It may be the catalyst for a broad demand for transparent services and simple, understandable communications. Eighty-five percent of us, according to our recent poll, are more likely to do business with companies that communicate in plain English.

So let’s make it happen. Refuse to do business with any organization that violates your need to know and understand – and support measures that simplify practices across all agencies and all industries. If we the people show resolve, then an era of simpler services can be launched.

It’s hard to hoodwink people if your practices are transparent. By standing up, we will spur an era of honesty. On top of that, businesses will be easier to manage thanks to clear strategies clearly communicated and employees who understand their own services. And customers will be less inclined to complain.

Openness strengthens relations among people. Transparency fosters trust. Americans’ mistrust of their institutions will persist long after this crisis unless we keep it simple.

From the Christian Science Monitor

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 23rd, 2009 by Siegel Gale

Clinton’s ‘Smart Power’ Slogan Is Just Plain Dumb, Branding Experts Say

Fox News

Alan Siegel, founder and head of Siegel + Gale, a brand consultancy, described “Smart Power” as an “unfortunate choice of words.” “I don’t think it’s good to say you’re smart,” he said. “I think it’s smarmy.” He said Clinton should have used words like “intelligent” or “sensitive” instead.

“I think that Hillary Clinton is a really smart, articulate woman and I think she’s going to be a good secretary of state,” Siegel said. “But I don’t think what we need now is more slogans….To say ’smart power’ is ridiculous.”

Read the entire article

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 22nd, 2009 by Alan Siegel

A Clarion Call for Simplicity

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

As we watched our new President take the oath of office, Americans were moved by the profound dignity of the scene. Something else struck me – the simple economy of the oath itself. A man assumed the role of our nation’s leader in just thirty-five words.

We all understand what the words mean. These words do not have nooks and crannies for the President to hide in. The oath forms a promise, fully understood by both giver and receiver. If that oath were written today, it would surely be ten times longer and replete with caveats and platitudes.

Sadly, Americans seldom encounter anything like the crystalline prose of that enduring oath. They pay phone bills they can’t decipher and see their credit card fees rise without understanding why. They receive health care bills and benefit statements that read like gibberish. And all year round they struggle with unintelligible government documents.

And yet they meekly accept the situation, resigned to thinking that they have no choice.

As a life-long champion of simplified processes and open communications, my question is: Why do we tolerate overly complex, confusing propositions? Why do we allow organizations to bury their intentions in technical jargon and legalese?

In my view, resignation in the face of complexity causes tremendous harm in commerce, government and everyday life. Public complacency encourages organizations to under-serve their customers – and even deceive them.

Indeed, our current economic crisis was fueled by widespread acceptance of arcane propositions. Many Americans took on mortgage debt without understanding the risks buried in stacks of paper. Bankers poured billions into bonds structured by financial engineers whose risk-analyses were over their heads. Wealthy investors fell victim to a multi-billion-dollar scam that few ever questioned.
We let marketers overwhelm us with infinite choices and mind-numbing terms. Consider this feature of one bank’s “Simplicity Card”: “All your APRs may automatically increase up to the Default APR if you default under any Card Agreement that you have with us because you fail to make a payment to us when due…” With effort, you can get the gist: Make a late payment on any card from the bank, and the bank will slam you on your new Simplicity Card.

The high holidays for our culture of confusing language is the annual rite of filing income taxes. Every spring, we submit to tax policies that few of us understand, so we hire experts to handle our taxes – emblematic of a dysfunctional relationship between citizens and government.

There is a silver lining to the recent financial meltdown: It has generated a rising tide of anger and mistrust. According to a recent poll, people trust their bankers and financial advisers far less than a year ago. An overwhelming majority of those surveyed said they think that financial firms deliberately foster complexity “to hide risks or to keep people in the dark” – a blunt indictment.

This may be the moment for Americans to begin fighting for transparent services and interactions that are simple and understandable. If we refuse to do business with any organization that dismisses our need to know and understand, then an era of simpler services can be launched.

I often hear that it is lawyers who clutter our lives with qualifications and disclaimers. But deferring to lawyers is the excuse of bureaucrats protecting their turf. Years ago, I wrestled with lawyers to transform pages of caveats and codicils into a simple loan note. In the end, my team reduced two hundred fifty words of jargon to this sentence: “If you don’t pay on time, you will be in default, and we will take legal action against you.” Not the oath of office, it’s true, but a blow struck for clear meaning.

Yes, clarity is achievable, and in my experience successful professionals in every field – from medicine to business – never hide behind a protective wall of jargon.

A few rare companies already thrive by living and breathing simplicity. One online bank does not insult customers with a densely worded booklet on “privacy policy.” This bank states plainly, “We will not give or sell your private information to anyone.” This is clear - and also blessedly in tune with consumer wishes.

Steve Jobs made Apple a model of simple, elegant design, with responsive products and easy-to-understand icons in place of techie jargon. Warren Buffett, the world’s most successful investor, explains his company’s strategy in simple words in an annual report that thousands read for wisdom and pleasure.

If our society can revive that spirit of simplicity embodied in the oath of office, there will be many benefits. One is that simplicity encourages honesty, since it’s hard to hoodwink people if your practices are transparent. Other benefits include the efficiencies gained by businesses that are easier to manage thanks to clear strategies clearly communicated, with employees who understand their own services and customers less inclined to complain – all of which translate into lower prices.
Our new President has vigorously called for transparency and openness in government. Let’s help him in this critical task – and support measures that simplify government practices across all agencies as a hallmark of the President’s reforms.

Clear disclosure may not prevent every Ponzi scheme, but it will empower people to ask questions and challenge con men. A transparent mortgage application process – with fewer, simpler documents - will not keep everyone from buying homes they cannot afford. But it will open some people’s eyes to built-in interest rate traps and the dangers of sharp declines in home prices.

As American citizens, we must not overlook the lessons of the current crisis and continue tolerating outrageously complex and confusing practices. We must seize this historic moment and set our society on a road where the paths of accountability and responsibility have merged.

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 20th, 2009 by Irene Etzkorn

An Oath of Simplicity

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
You can be sure that if this oath were being crafted today, it would be ten times the length, filled with caveats and riddled with pomposity and ambiguity. The transformational words of The Oath of Office are the public expression of profound change. Beautifully direct, succinct yet emotionally stirring, they convey the enormity of the task and acceptance of the responsibility. Most importantly, we all understand what they mean. These words do not have nooks and crannies for the President to hide behind. The oath forms a promise, fully understood by both giver and receiver.

As a nation, we have lost touch with the power of simplicity. My hope is that President Obama will lead us to shake off the shackles of complacency in our daily lives. Citizens should interact with government and consumers transact with companies only when both parties understand what they are seeking and offering.

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 15th, 2009 by Siegel Gale

Can the Apple Brand Thrive After Steven Jobs?

Advertising Age

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — Can Brand Apple survive without Steve Jobs? The maker of the world’s most coveted electronic devices is about to find out.
Jobs announced he’s stepping down from day-to-day management of Apple until June while he copes with a health problem he called “more complicated than I originally thought.”

Steve Jobs
Apple will have a tougher time if Mr. Jobs’ health forces him out of the company permanently. “If he were to leave it would be very complicated; Apple has the most unique, compelling, consistent voice of any company,” said Alan Siegel, founder of branding firm Siegel & Gale.

Read the complete article

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 15th, 2009 by Siegel Gale

Plenty of New Brands to C-E-S in Las Vegas

Once again the New Year was greeted by the annual pilgrimage of media magnates and technophiles from around the world to the balmy desert valley of Las Vegas, where throngs of buyers and sellers convened at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) to make deals, make news or just be seen.

This year, as might be expected, show attendance was off, but only marginally – a good sign in this troubled economy. More importantly, most large exhibitors were in attendance with ‘full throttle’ showcases of their wears – another good sign, as large scale absences from the likes of Microsoft, Motorola and Sony would have been another bad omen for the present and future economy.

From a brand perspective this year’s CES offered a natural concentration of benefits surrounding features and functionality – which makes sense given that these are “gadget guys” at their heart. What was subliminally interesting was how brand messaging is now so laser focused on attributes that involve Simplicity and Efficacy, which is directly correlated to the ‘Age of Google’, where a new threshold was ushered in that now demands that products and services be simple to use and work very well. To this end, as the electronics and media eco-systems continue to converge, less focus is being placed on brand attributes driven by emotion or aspirational qualities as most branding-driven communications are themed around performance versus perception.

Television
Among the most notable feature-driven brand innovation was the world’s thinnest television, showcased by South Korean electronics giant Samsung. This product, just a novelty at this point and not market ready, measures just 6.5mm (0.26 inches) and has a screen aspect ratio of 48 inches. Appealing to the earliest of early adapters, the television is awesome to behold, with its crystal clear LCD screen and sleek encasement, it looks like a massive, live-action post card and will be certain to make some high-net worth consumers very happy, considering that it is rumored to retail for over $50,000 when it is shipped to the marketplace, in limited edition.

From my branding perch at CES, this Years New Year’s Resolution is simple - THIN IS IN.

Add Comment.

Permalink

Jan 14th, 2009 by Siegel Gale

“President Obama: Make Clarity, Transparency, Simplicity a Priority,” Say 79% of the American People

New Siegel+Gale Survey Finds 75% Believe Complexity Played Major Role in Current Financial Crisis

NEW YORK, NY—January 14, 2009—”People are desperate for clarity and simplicity in order to make informed decisions,” says Alan Siegel, Founder and Chairman of global brand consultancy Siegel+Gale. “There is a huge opportunity for government and business to overcome cynicism and regain lost trust through the way they communicate with their constituents and customers.”

A new survey of 1,214 American homeowners and investors conducted by Siegel+Gale between December 29, 2008 and January 5, 2009, released today, shows an overwhelming majority demand more clarity in communications from companies and the government. Fully 84% of all consumers say they are more likely to trust a company that uses jargon-free, plain English in communications. And 79% say they think it is “very important” that President Obama “mandate that clarity, transparency, and plain English be a requirement of every new law, regulation and policy.”

“Transparency and authenticity are the new marketing imperatives,” says Lee Rafkin, Siegel+Gale’s Global Director of Simplification. “People are fed up and desperate for institutions and brands that offer simple and honest communications they can understand. That’s the clear message from our most recent research survey.”

Complexity Up; Trust Down

Three-quarters of survey respondents (75%) say that complexity and lack of understanding have played a significant role in the current financial crisis. Moreover, 63% of those surveyed feel that “banks, mortgage lenders and Wall Street intentionally make things complicated to hide risks or to keep people in the dark.”

Trust in companies is predictably down, the survey shows. Compared to one year ago, 37% are less likely to trust their mortgage lender, 36% are less likely to trust their broker or financial advisor, and 35% are less likely to trust their bank.

However, consumers agreed they should shoulder some of the blame for the financial crisis. Over half of all surveyed admitted to not reading or attempting to understand the complicated documents they sign. And 50% agreed with the statement, “Financial products are inherently complicated. It’s the final responsibility of the customer to make sure they understand all the risks.”

The Power of Simplicity

The survey asked how much of an impact jargon-free, plain-English explanations and disclosures would make on consumer interest in a number of categories. Consumers reported:

  • a 79% increased interest in investing in a financial product,
  • a 73% increased interest in selecting a broker or a financial advisor,
  • a 67% increased interest in purchasing a life insurance policy,
  • a 63% increased interest in taking out a loan, and
  • a 63% increased interest in applying for a credit card.

To download a copy of the survey, click here. To speak with Alan Siegel, Founder and Chairman, please contact Gail Nelson of Siegel+Gale at 212-453-1468 or gnelson@siegelgale.com.

Add Comment.

Permalink