We think, therefore, we are. What do you think?

Archive for May, 2008

May 28th, 2008 by Siegel Gale

Siegel+Gale Appoints David Keefe Global Director, Media & Entertainment

Siegel+Gale, one of the world’s premier strategic branding firms, announced today the appointment of David Keefe as Global Director, Media & Entertainment at Siegel+Gale.

"Siegel+Gale has worked strategically with media and entertainment brands for over 30 years," says Alan Siegel, Chairman and CEO. "But never has the pace of change in the industry been so rapid or so fundamental—and never has the role of building new brands been so crucial.

"David Keefe is the perfect person to build our Media & Entertainment offering worldwide. He has nearly 20 years of industry marketing, research, and business development experience, and a very nuanced understanding of both the challenges and opportunities inherent to the future of the media and entertainment industries."

"The days of single-platform media brands are long gone," says Mr. Keefe. "Media companies are now distributing their products and services across three-to-four platforms. And for the first time they are offering consumers truly interactive products. With each new platform or channel, the need for strategic branding becomes more acute. We have developed real expertise in helping large media companies tackle these complex challenges."

(more…)

Add Comment.

Permalink

May 22nd, 2008 by Michelle Stuffman

Aligning the Health Care Organization to Keep Your Brand Promises

Health care organizations are increasingly developing consumer-focused brand identities. While there is a solid business case for this shift, it’s simply not enough to develop a positioning that evokes high-level emotional themes. Your positioning must be a promise. Defining a promise that is distinct from competitors is challenging enough, but the bigger challenge is to consistently deliver on it. Aligning promise and delivery in health care is a complex and delicate exercise because when a health care company fails to keep its promise—nearly always related to a consumer’s well-being—the consumer tends to take it very personally.


ACCORDING TO A 2006 STUDY PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF BRAND MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATIONS CAN LOSE UP TO 40% OF THEIR MARKETING INVESTMENT WHEN EMPLOYEES DO NOT DELIVER ON THE ORGANIZATION’S PROMISES. — Journal of Brand Management, 14, 2006


Consider the recent case of a large, national insurance provider, whose promise is articulated through a symbolic service mark that dramatically illustrated a link to wellness and a caring organizational approach. The company declined a request by a 17-year-old leukemia patient for a liver transplant, because the procedure was deemed experimental. The attending physicians disagreed, which led the family to believe that the insurance company wanted to sidestep responsibility in an effort to control costs. Not surprisingly, this action was interpreted to be the antithesis of the brand’s promise, and this incensed consumers and stimulated unwanted media attention. While it is likely that the incident was based on valid business decision systems, the viability of the brand was compromised by the disconnect in promise and practice. It’s possible that the controversy could have been averted if those who were empowered to make these decisions had the proper tools and information to behave and communicate in a “branded” way.

(more…)

Comments (1)

Permalink

May 22nd, 2008 by Siegel Gale

A Pit Stop Approach To Brand Implementation

There is a new catch phrase emerging in the corporate world: “How can we change the tires while the car is moving?”


BY TACTICALLY EVALUATING THE ROLE OF YOUR TOUCH POINTS IN THE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE, YOU CAN ENSURE THAT EVERY ACTION TAKEN IS BUILDING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE.


We seldom heard this question until recently, but now our clients in the C-suite are asking it frequently. The question brings to life the difficulty of executing change in a demanding business environment where performance and results cannot be compromised. Brand strategy once lived in the realm of the long-term investment: Developing and implementing brand programs might cost a lot of time and money in the short-term, but would yield long-term gains. But in more challenging economic times, the focus must be on short-term results—the car HAS to keep moving, now more than ever.

The problem with the dilemma posed by the “changing the tires while the car is moving” metaphor is that it is based on an outdated notion of the change management process, which has been described as “Unfreezing, Changing, and Refreezing.” (Fred Nickols, Change Management 101: A Primer.) The common conception of change management is that a company starts in a stable place, loosens up to prepare for change, implements change, and then stabilizes within a new paradigm.

A more contemporary view of change management suggests that change must occur constantly and in smaller increments for organizations to survive and thrive. Seth Godin suggests that organizations should consider an evolutionary model of change. “Evolution— defined as inheritable modifications over many generations—is the most powerful tool we have for dealing with change.” (Fast Company, December 19, 2007) “It is our fear of changing a winning strategy and our reliance on command-and-control tactics that make us miserable—not change. Change doesn’t have to be the enemy. We start bypassing our fear of change by constantly training people to make small changes.”

If your brand is not delivering real business value to the organization, you should not be afraid that change will require you to sacrifice business performance in the short-term. Whether you need to develop and deliver on a new brand promise and identity that is more relevant to customers, or whether you simply need to optimize your brand throughout the customer experience, taking a pit stop approach to change will yield results now and in the future.

(more…)

Add Comment.

Permalink

May 15th, 2008 by Irene Etzkorn

Simplicity War

"Faux Simplicity" vs. True Simplicity – Corporate Winners and Losers

"True simplicity provides a dramatic, compelling competitive advantage for any organization," says Irene Etzkorn, Director of Simplification at Siegel+Gale. "As companies, political candidates, the publishers of Real Simple magazine, and the creators of the new Time Warner ad campaign have found, the mere mention of the word ’simple’ is a hook for purchasers.

"The thought of assembling a product sends shivers through most consumers who envision hours of frustration and a few pieces ‘left over.’ The promise of technology, investing, or health care made simple is alluring. For that reason, advertisers and marketers stock their copy with the words ‘easy,’ ‘convenient,’ ‘quick,’ and ’simplified.’ Simplicity sells in politics, too – one of John McCain’s greatest appeals is his ‘Straight Talk Express’ campaign theme.

"However, companies who falsely proclaim simplicity create a jaded and cynical marketplace. ‘Faux simplicity’ undermines the valid efforts of others who work hard to achieve simplicity. And products, services and people that really deliver on the promise of clarity and simplicity are few and far between.

"Fortunately, a precious few have gotten it right," says Ms. Etzkorn.

Following is her list of winners and losers in the simplicity wars.

WINNERS:

+  ING Direct: Unlike the impersonal, automated interactions that characterize most financial transactions, the experience at ING Direct is friendly, humane and highly efficient.

When they send a letter confirming a change to a PIN number, the letter sounds as though a person rather than a computer wrote it: "If it is correct, then all you have to do is have a great day."

The clear, reassuring tone inspires confidence. As Arkadi Kuhlmann, Chairman, President and CEO of ING Direct USA says, "Companies become extremely authentic when they become clear and the busier life gets, the more value there is in simplicity as a point of competitive differentiation." He has no sympathy for companies that perpetuate an atmosphere of complexity as a means of fostering confusion, attributing their motives to avarice. "Most companies focus on short-term shareholder value. Instead of maximizing the number of loyal customers and recognizing their long-term potential," Kuhlmann says, "companies ‘nickel and dime’ them." ING Direct, in contrast, has no fees. In his view, his competitors "waste their energy squeezing every last penny out of current customers and then have to find new ones."

+  Chubb Insurance and its "hassle-free" claims experience: Chubb Insurance, a high-end property/casualty insurer has also embraced and maintained simplicity – a rarity in the insurance market. Its personal lines policy, Masterpiece®, tells policyholders what is excluded and if something is not specifically excluded, it is covered. Written in plain English with customized content and an inviting page layout, the clarity of the policy sets a tone of openness and honesty.

And, simplicity often translates to speed. The revolutionary effect of Masterpiece ® is evident in the numbers: 95% of policies and 97% of endorsements are out the door within 7 days in an industry that typically measures turnaround in weeks, not days. While this is pleasing to customers, it is even more astounding for agents who see the creaking wheels of Chubb’s competitors.

(more…)

Add Comment.

Permalink

May 14th, 2008 by Siegel Gale

Co-President & Chief Strategy Officer, David Srere on CNBC Business News

David Srere on CNBC

Co-President & Chief Strategy Officer, David Srere appeared on CNBC Business news to comment as brand expert on LG’s new LCD Flat Panel Ad Campaign. Revolving around a TV trailer for an upcoming fictional television series entitled “Scarlet“, LG seeks to attract mass audiences to its website in an effort to lure new customers to purchase its new line of products.

The controversial question: Marketing stunt or scam? Can “trailer marketing” effectively sell hi-tech products or is this just another expensive media play by a large company where they ring the dinner bell only to leave tens of thousands of hungry customers expecting a fancy feast, waiting for little more than table scraps. CNBC’s LA correspondent, Julia Boorstin, seeks answers and calls on Siegel+Gale for comment. See the news excerpt.

Add Comment.

Permalink

May 5th, 2008 by Siegel Gale

Fortune Magazine’s First Ever F-500 Corporate Identity Competition

May 5th- Fortune Magazine’s Annual Fortune 500 Issue Presents First Ever Company Logo Smackdown

For the first time ever, Fortune Magazine decided to conduct a logo competition among the most powerful Fortune 500 brands. Siegel+Gale identity experts Howard Belk and Sven Seger were called upon by Fortune to judge which of the many logos were deemed worthy of the #1 spot! The following S+G decision criteria were used to carefully screen from the many logo candidates:

fortune magazine\'s  F-500

1. Name: A logo’s name is very important. You should be able to name a logo in two to three words. If you can’t do that, it is not a good logo. If it has a name, it has an idea. If you can’t name it, it most likely doesn’t have an idea because ideas don’t exist without a name. BP’s logo is called The Helios Mark. Great name, great idea, great logo.

2. Personality: Companies have personalities, and depending on how you render an image, ranging from serious, to friendly, the image’s style can represent the personality of the company. Depending on how it is drawn, a flower can be elegant, exclusive, and sophisticated, or approachable, warm and genuine. When we know the personality of a brand, we can express it through color and shape.
Good examples are Yahoo (enthusiastic) and Deutsche Bank (rational).

3. Metaphor: Linking an already understood association of an object to a brand in the form of a relevant metaphor can be very powerful.
Good examples are Unilever (Garden of Eden), Merrill Lynch (Bull) and BP (Flower)

4. New Combinations: Merging different forms into a singular image such that they can be read from multiple perspectives allows for the creation of a very proprietary logo. The Time Warner Cable logo is a wonderful example of this. The ear and an eye are combined to form a singular image that represents the multi-sensory aspect of the brand’s products. Bank of America is another great example. The combination of the American flag and a landscape makes it a “flagscape,” the people’s bank from coast to coast in America.

5. Strategic Purpose: A logo’s design is stronger when it can be connected to the strategic intent of the brand. This connection may be direct or indirect, explicit or learned, but nonetheless, present in the design of the mark. By utilizing an image of the flower, the BP logo represents the company’s concern for environmental sustainability.

6. Touchpoint: A logo’s design should take advantage of the touchpoint on which it is most often found. “Touchpoint relevant” design means forming a triangular relationship between the brand, it’s primary touchpoints, and the logo.
UPS does this well. Taking advantage of the 750,000 package trucks operating in the US alone, the design of its logo, a beveled shield, looks like it belongs on the truck. Apple does this well too. The current design of the apple reflects the “liquid” User Interface, the most proprietary aspect of the brand.

7. Reduction: Purity. Simplicity. Essence. All words used to describe the beauty of reduced form. It is no different with logo design. If we reduce something to its most simple level, it will represent an idea, rather than depict something literal. A well crafted logo has a certain level of reduction so that it’s form may communicate the idea.

Of the top F-500 logo contenders, Target took the prize! Simple, distinct, and clear, this “to-the-point” logo turns the brand into an event. From advertising to co-branding to alliance marketing effectiveness, the “Design for all” tag-line, is engaging, demonstrative and effective.

Bullseye!

Add Comment.

Permalink